Bioinformatics · Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Learning goal: explain what each technology measures—and what it cannot tell us on its own.
from http://chrismadden.co.uk
Exon does not mean protein-coding: exons can contain untranslated regions.
Alternative splicing changes the RNA product without changing the genomic DNA.
A pre-mRNA contains exon segments separated by an intron. Spliceosome components recognise RNA signals and bring the reacting sites together. The intron forms a lariat, the exon ends are joined, and the intron is released. The mature RNA can include untranslated as well as protein-coding sequence. Alternative choices of splice sites can produce other RNA isoforms.
Authored equivalent of the teaching content; not a verbatim transcript.
How do the exon ends meet while the intron is removed?
The film simplifies exons as coding sequence. Remember that exons also include UTRs.
Explain which molecular interaction makes this step selective.
| Pattern | What changes? |
|---|---|
| Exon skipping | An exon is included or omitted |
| Alternative 5′ splice site | One exon boundary changes |
| Alternative 3′ splice site | The other exon boundary changes |
| Mutually exclusive exons | One of two alternatives is selected |
| Intron retention | An intron remains in the RNA |
5′/3′ refer to the intron’s splice sites, not the left/right of every drawing.

Alternative splicing produces transcripts with different exon combinations that can encode different proteins.
Figure: Crabtree + Company / NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences, The New Genetics. Original full-resolution image.
An expressed transcript is not proof of a stable, functional protein.
SMN1 and SMN2 are paralogous genes, not two isoforms of one gene.
A sequence difference in SMN2 exon 7 changes splicing regulation. SMN2 transcripts frequently skip exon 7.
Exon 7 included → full-length SMN
Exon 7 skipped → shortened isoform
Both outcomes can occur: this is a change in proportions.

lacZ encodes β-galactosidase, not lactase.
The figure simplifies induction by showing lactose.
Alternative promoter use and alternative splicing are distinct mechanisms that can occur together.
Image from Kel A.E., Ratner V.A.
Posttranslational modification (PTM) is the chemical modification of a protein after its translation.
PTM extends the range of functions of a protein:
Attaching to it other biochemical functional groups.
Changing the chemical nature of an amino acid (e.g. citrullination).
Making structural changes, like the formation of disulfide bridges.
Removing amino acids from the amino end of the protein
Cutting the peptide chain in the middle.
The proteome is the set of proteins present in a biological system under specified conditions.
Proteins have structural, catalytic, transport, regulatory, and immune roles. Protein abundance and modification depend on cell type and state.
Some genes produce functional RNAs rather than proteins.
| Biological quantity | A suitable measurement | Main caution |
|---|---|---|
| RNA abundance | Microarray or RNA-seq | Not a direct protein measurement |
| Protein abundance | Mass spectrometry or immunoassay | Isoforms and detection biases matter |
| Protein activity | Functional assay | Abundance alone is insufficient |
RNA abundance reflects both synthesis and degradation.
Translation and protein turnover further separate RNA and protein levels.
Expression microarrays estimate the abundance of selected RNA targets. They do not directly measure protein abundance or post-translational modifications.
Complementary single-stranded DNA or RNA molecules associate through base pairing to form a duplex.
Depends on:
The concentration of the original single-stranded polymers,
Sequence complementarity, temperature, salt concentration and time.
Dye bias and background must be corrected before interpreting ratios.
Known sequences at known positions.
Labelled sample molecules encounter probes.
Retained fluorescence provides an abundance-related signal.
Signal also depends on affinity, background and saturation.


A dense probe array is one component of a workflow: sample preparation → hybridisation → washing → scanning.
| One-colour array | Two-colour array | |
|---|---|---|
| Samples per array | One | Usually two |
| Labelling | Same label across samples | Different dyes |
| Comparison | Across arrays | Within an array, then across arrays |
| Essential correction | Background and between-array effects | Background, dye and array effects |
| Result | Relative expression after processing | Relative expression after processing |
Neither produces absolute transcript counts directly.
The samples compete for the same probes. Consider dye swaps and biological replication when designing the comparison.
A brighter raw spot on array B is not enough to conclude higher expression. Processing and replicate variation matter.
| Manufacturing approach | How probes are made | Main idea |
|---|---|---|
| Spotted arrays | Prepare DNA/oligos, then deposit them | Place existing probes at chosen positions |
| Light-directed in situ synthesis | Add bases on the surface using patterned light | Light selects which features can grow |
| Inkjet in situ synthesis | Deliver reagents to selected positions | Local reagent delivery selects growth |
A feature contains many copies of a designed probe sequence.
The next slides explain classical light-directed synthesis.
| Probe length N | Possible sequences: 4ᴺ | Base-specific cycles: at most 4N* |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 2 | 16 | 8 |
| 3 | 64 | 12 |
| 10 | 1,048,576 | 40 |
| 25 | 1,125,899,906,842,624 | 100 |
Parallel synthesis saves cycles; it does not create unlimited chip area.
*Idealised A/C/G/T schedule at each position. A cycle includes exposure, coupling and washing; actual chemistry has additional steps. Only the selected probe designs fit on the chip.
A glass surface carries linkers with light-sensitive protecting groups. Patterned light removes protection only at selected features. A protected nucleotide reagent contacts the surface and couples at those exposed ends. Washing removes excess reagent. Repeating different light patterns and base additions builds many copies of each designed probe in parallel. Light provides spatial selectivity; this is chemical synthesis rather than polymerase copying.
Authored equivalent of the teaching content; not a verbatim transcript.
Which step provides spatial selectivity: the light pattern or the nucleotide reagent?
Why can many different probes grow in parallel?
Explain which molecular interaction makes this step selective.
Transition: can we read sample-derived sequences instead of measuring binding to a fixed probe set?
RNA molecules in the sample
A library of RNA-derived DNA fragments
Sequence reads and quality scores
In conventional short-read RNA-seq, reverse transcription makes cDNA. The sequencer reads DNA; analysis relates those reads back to RNA abundance and structure.
Direct RNA sequencing is a different technology.
New DNA is always synthesised 5′ → 3′.
Reverse transcription makes cDNA; PCR amplifies DNA.
Heating separates a DNA duplex without breaking its backbones. Cooling allows two primers to bind opposite template strands, with their extendable 3′ ends pointing towards the target. DNA polymerase adds nucleotides to these ends, synthesising new strands 5′ to 3′. Repeated separation, primer binding and extension ideally doubles the DNA each cycle. Real reactions have less than perfect efficiency, and early products need not have both final target boundaries.
Authored equivalent of the teaching content; not a verbatim transcript.
Locate the primers. Which ends can the polymerase extend?
Why is one primer not sufficient for ordinary exponential PCR?
Explain which molecular interaction makes this step selective.
| Completed cycles | Ideal copies from one template |
|---|---|
| 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 2 |
| 3 | 8 |
| 10 | 1,024 |
| 20 | 1,048,576 |
The ideal model is 2ⁿ. Real reactions have variable efficiency and eventually plateau.
Copies from one molecule are not independent biological replicates. Sequence-dependent amplification can distort representation.
A perfect sequencer cannot rescue a confounded experiment.
| Strategy | What is enriched or retained? | Important consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Poly(A) selection | Polyadenylated RNA, mainly eukaryotic mRNA | Misses many non-polyadenylated RNAs |
| rRNA depletion | RNA remaining after removing targeted rRNAs | Can include non-coding RNA and pre-mRNA |
| Targeted capture | Selected transcripts/regions | Limited by the target design |
Choose for the organism, RNA integrity and biological question.
The library is a selected representation of the RNA sample.
A representative workflow: some protocols fragment cDNA instead, combine steps, or use different adapter-addition strategies. Strand-specific chemistry preserves information about the original RNA strand.
Index ≠ UMI: sample identity and molecule identity answer different questions.
One labelled base is too dim for the classical ensemble imaging strategy.
Local amplification creates a clonal cluster of many copies.
Copies ideally incorporate the same base in the same cycle.
The imager reads the combined signal at that position.
A cluster is a technical copy population, not a biological replicate.
| PCR in solution | Classical bridge amplification | |
|---|---|---|
| Primers | Free in the liquid | Tethered to the surface |
| Products | Dispersed through the tube | Remain near the seed molecule |
| Main teaching purpose here | Enrich/amplify a library | Make individually imaged clusters |
| Shared principle | Primer binding → extension → separation | Primer binding → extension → separation |
The library contains DNA derived from RNA, not RNA being copied by DNA polymerase.
Randomly positioned clusters can be generated by bridge amplification.
Defined nanowells control cluster positions; Illumina platforms can use exclusion amplification (ExAmp) and platform-specific clustering chemistry.
Keep the invariant idea: many local copies produce an interpretable sequencing signal. Check the instrument’s chemistry before describing its exact clustering method.
Index reads identify the sample; they are separate from the biological insert reads.
| Read evidence | What does it support? |
|---|---|
| Inside shared E1 | Expression, but not a unique isoform |
| Across E1–E2 or E2–E3 | Exon 2 inclusion |
| Across E1–E3 | Exon 2 skipping |
A splice-aware genome alignment can jump across introns. Transcriptome-based quantification uses a different reference representation.
Short reads may not uniquely resolve complete isoforms.
| Illustrative molecule counts | Condition A | Condition B |
|---|---|---|
| Isoform with exon 2 | 80 | 20 |
| Isoform without exon 2 | 20 | 80 |
| Total for the gene | 100 | 100 |
Gene-level abundance is unchanged, while exon inclusion falls from 80% to 20%.
Real RNA-seq estimates must account for ambiguity, effective length, sampling and replicate variation. These are idealised molecule counts, not raw read counts.
Raw counts depend on sequencing depth and composition. A count is not automatically an absolute number of cellular RNA molecules.
| Question or property | Microarray | Short-read RNA-seq |
|---|---|---|
| Known genes | Probe-based intensity | Sequence-derived abundance |
| Unanticipated transcripts | Limited by probe design | Can provide new sequence evidence |
| Alternative splicing | Needs informative probes | Junctions and isoform evidence |
| Main limitations | Cross-hybridisation, saturation | Sampling, mapping ambiguity, library bias |
| Protein abundance? | Not directly | Not directly |
Both need good design, controls, replication and validation.
Compare RNA abundance in cardiac versus skeletal muscle, or across cell differentiation.
Cells exposed to different conditions.
Physical (temperature, radiation).
Chemical (toxins).
Changing nutrient availability.
Compare tumour with matched non-tumour samples.
Study disease-associated expression changes alongside other molecular and clinical evidence.
Drug response.

The following original figures document early biomarker enthusiasm and reproducibility concerns.
“The discriminatory pattern correctly identified all 50 ovarian cancer cases in the masked set, including all 18 stage I cases. Of the 66 cases of non malignant disease, 63 were recognized as not cancer. This result yielded a sensitivity of 100% specificity of 95%”
“I’ve been in cancer research for 40 years and I think it’s the most important breakthrough in those years,” said Dr. John S. Kovach, director of…
Correlogic Systems… Quest Diagnostics and LabCorp… say they expect to begin offering the test in the next few months.
Next: preprocessing, quality control and differential expression.
Detailed provenance and reuse information: MEDIA_SOURCES.md. Original interactive diagrams are editable teaching schematics; they simplify molecular scale and chemistry.

Bioinformatics · UPC · b2slab