Gene expression technologies

Bioinformatics · Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya

Alexandre Perera-Lluna

From transcripts to measurements

  1. Gene regulation and alternative splicing
  2. Microarrays: hybridisation, fluorescence and probe manufacture
  3. PCR → library preparation → RNA sequencing
  4. From reads to biological conclusions

Learning goal: explain what each technology measures—and what it cannot tell us on its own.

We still have to find a way to answer

We still have to find a way to answer..

from http://chrismadden.co.uk

Notes on Gene Transcription

Notes on Gene Transcription

One gene can produce several RNA isoforms

  • Transcription produces a pre-mRNA containing exons and introns.
  • Splicing joins selected exon segments and removes intervening sequences.
  • Different splice choices create different transcript isoforms.

Exon does not mean protein-coding: exons can contain untranslated regions.

One pre-mRNA produces alternative mature transcripts

The spliceosome makes a precise connection

  • The spliceosome recognises splice sites and a branch point in the pre-mRNA.
  • The intron forms a lariat intermediate; the adjacent exons are ligated.
  • Regulatory proteins and RNA sequence/structure influence which sites are used.
  • Most major-spliceosome introns have GU…AG boundaries in RNA; these two dinucleotides alone do not define a splice site.

Alternative splicing changes the RNA product without changing the genomic DNA.

RNA splicing in three dimensions

Accessible teaching summary

A pre-mRNA contains exon segments separated by an intron. Spliceosome components recognise RNA signals and bring the reacting sites together. The intron forms a lariat, the exon ends are joined, and the intron is released. The mature RNA can include untranslated as well as protein-coding sequence. Alternative choices of splice sites can produce other RNA isoforms.

Authored equivalent of the teaching content; not a verbatim transcript.

Watch for this

How do the exon ends meet while the intron is removed?

The film simplifies exons as coding sequence. Remember that exons also include UTRs.

Then explain

Explain which molecular interaction makes this step selective.

Five common patterns of alternative splicing

Pattern What changes?
Exon skipping An exon is included or omitted
Alternative 5′ splice site One exon boundary changes
Alternative 3′ splice site The other exon boundary changes
Mutually exclusive exons One of two alternatives is selected
Intron retention An intron remains in the RNA

5′/3′ refer to the intron’s splice sites, not the left/right of every drawing.

Five patterns of alternative splicing

Alternative splicing: different exon combinations

NIH illustration: one gene with four exons produces exon combinations 1–2–3 and 1–2–4, leading to protein A and protein B.

Alternative splicing produces transcripts with different exon combinations that can encode different proteins.

Figure: Crabtree + Company / NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences, The New Genetics. Original full-resolution image.

Different RNA does not always mean different protein

  • A coding-region change can add or remove a protein domain.
  • A splice change may shift the reading frame or introduce a premature stop.
  • Some transcripts are targeted by nonsense-mediated decay.
  • Changes confined to UTRs can affect RNA stability, localisation or translation.

An expressed transcript is not proof of a stable, functional protein.

A concrete example: SMN exon 7

SMN1 and SMN2 are paralogous genes, not two isoforms of one gene.

A sequence difference in SMN2 exon 7 changes splicing regulation. SMN2 transcripts frequently skip exon 7.

Two splice outcomes

E6E7E8

Exon 7 included → full-length SMN

E6E8

Exon 7 skipped → shortened isoform

Both outcomes can occur: this is a change in proportions.

Promoters and regulatory sequences

  • A promoter helps recruit the machinery that initiates transcription.
  • Initiation depends on regulatory proteins, DNA context and, in eukaryotes, chromatin.
  • In bacterial operons, an operator is a regulatory protein-binding site.
  • Eukaryotic enhancers can act at a distance; they are not simply bacterial operators.

Promoter and regulatory protein binding

The lac operon: a bacterial example

lacZ encodes β-galactosidase, not lactase.

  • LacI represses transcription by binding the operator.
  • Allolactose, derived from lactose, reduces repressor binding.
  • Strong expression also depends on glucose availability through cAMP–CAP.

The figure simplifies induction by showing lactose.

The lac operon: a bacterial example

Promoter Choice

  • A gene may have multiple promoters and transcription start sites.
  • Different promoters can produce different first exons or 5′ UTRs.
  • Coding sequences may also differ, depending on transcript structure.

Alternative promoter use and alternative splicing are distinct mechanisms that can occur together.

Image from Kel A.E., Ratner V.A.

Promoter Choice

Post Translational Modifications

Posttranslational modification (PTM) is the chemical modification of a protein after its translation.

PTM extends the range of functions of a protein:

  • Attaching to it other biochemical functional groups.

  • Changing the chemical nature of an amino acid (e.g. citrullination).

  • Making structural changes, like the formation of disulfide bridges.

  • Removing amino acids from the amino end of the protein

  • Cutting the peptide chain in the middle.

Post Translational Modifications

The proteome

The proteome is the set of proteins present in a biological system under specified conditions.

Proteins have structural, catalytic, transport, regulatory, and immune roles. Protein abundance and modification depend on cell type and state.

Some genes produce functional RNAs rather than proteins.

Proteins are important

What are we actually measuring?

Biological quantity A suitable measurement Main caution
RNA abundance Microarray or RNA-seq Not a direct protein measurement
Protein abundance Mass spectrometry or immunoassay Isoforms and detection biases matter
Protein activity Functional assay Abundance alone is insufficient

RNA abundance reflects both synthesis and degradation.

Translation and protein turnover further separate RNA and protein levels.

Measuring mRNA abundance

Expression microarrays estimate the abundance of selected RNA targets. They do not directly measure protein abundance or post-translational modifications.

Measuring mRNA abundance

How do DNA arrays work?

Hybridization

Complementary single-stranded DNA or RNA molecules associate through base pairing to form a duplex.

Yield

Depends on:

  1. The concentration of the original single-stranded polymers,

  2. Sequence complementarity, temperature, salt concentration and time.

How DNA arrays work?

DNA Hybridization

DNA Hybridization

Fluorescent labels turn binding into a signal

Two-colour arrays

  • Label one sample with Cy3 and the other with Cy5.
  • Hybridise both to the same array; scan the channels separately.
  • Displayed green/red colours represent channel intensities.
  • Yellow in the composite means signal in both channels—not automatically equal biological expression.

Dye bias and background must be corrected before interpreting ratios.

Cy3 and Cy5 fluorescent dyes

Hybridisation: from solution to a surface signal

1 · Immobilise probes

Probes fixed to a surface

Known sequences at known positions.

2 · Add targets

Targets in solution

Labelled sample molecules encounter probes.

3 · Wash and scan

Targets hybridised to complementary probes

Retained fluorescence provides an abundance-related signal.

Signal also depends on affinity, background and saturation.

Competitive hybridization

Competitive hybridization

Probes

Probes

From a chip to an automated assay

Historical Affymetrix microarray chip

GeneTitan processing instrument

A dense probe array is one component of a workflow: sample preparation → hybridisation → washing → scanning.

One channel and two channels answer comparisons differently

One-colour array Two-colour array
Samples per array One Usually two
Labelling Same label across samples Different dyes
Comparison Across arrays Within an array, then across arrays
Essential correction Background and between-array effects Background, dye and array effects
Result Relative expression after processing Relative expression after processing

Neither produces absolute transcript counts directly.

Two-colour microarray: a paired measurement

Sample A→
label A · Cy3
↘
Sample B→
label B · Cy5
↗
ONE array → two scans → corrected channel ratio

The samples compete for the same probes. Consider dye swaps and biological replication when designing the comparison.

One-colour microarray: one sample per chip

Sample A→
same label
→Array A
Sample B→
same label
→Array B
Background correction → normalisation → compare corresponding probes

A brighter raw spot on array B is not enough to conclude higher expression. Processing and replicate variation matter.

How are the probes put on a chip?

Manufacturing approach How probes are made Main idea
Spotted arrays Prepare DNA/oligos, then deposit them Place existing probes at chosen positions
Light-directed in situ synthesis Add bases on the surface using patterned light Light selects which features can grow
Inkjet in situ synthesis Deliver reagents to selected positions Local reagent delivery selects growth

A feature contains many copies of a designed probe sequence.

The next slides explain classical light-directed synthesis.

Light selects where the next base is added

Probe synthesis: sequence space versus manufacturing cycles

Probe length N Possible sequences: 4ᴺ Base-specific cycles: at most 4N*
1 4 4
2 16 8
3 64 12
10 1,048,576 40
25 1,125,899,906,842,624 100

Parallel synthesis saves cycles; it does not create unlimited chip area.

*Idealised A/C/G/T schedule at each position. A cycle includes exposure, coupling and washing; actual chemistry has additional steps. Only the selected probe designs fit on the chip.

Watch a GeneChip being built

Accessible teaching summary

A glass surface carries linkers with light-sensitive protecting groups. Patterned light removes protection only at selected features. A protected nucleotide reagent contacts the surface and couples at those exposed ends. Washing removes excess reagent. Repeating different light patterns and base additions builds many copies of each designed probe in parallel. Light provides spatial selectivity; this is chemical synthesis rather than polymerase copying.

Authored equivalent of the teaching content; not a verbatim transcript.

Watch for this

Which step provides spatial selectivity: the light pattern or the nucleotide reagent?

Why can many different probes grow in parallel?

Then explain

Explain which molecular interaction makes this step selective.

Microarrays: powerful, but constrained by their probes

  • You mainly measure sequences represented by the probe design.
  • Related sequences may cross-hybridise.
  • Background and saturation limit the usable signal range.
  • Transcript isoforms are distinguishable only if the probes target informative regions or junctions.

Transition: can we read sample-derived sequences instead of measuring binding to a fixed probe set?

RNA-seq: sample RNA, read DNA, infer expression

Biological material

RNA molecules in the sample

Sequencing material

A library of RNA-derived DNA fragments

Observed data

Sequence reads and quality scores

In conventional short-read RNA-seq, reverse transcription makes cDNA. The sequencer reads DNA; analysis relates those reads back to RNA abundance and structure.

Direct RNA sequencing is a different technology.

Before the flow cell: what does PCR do?

The ingredients

  • A DNA template
  • Two primers that flank a target
  • A thermostable DNA polymerase
  • dNTPs, buffer and suitable ions

The principle

  1. Separate the DNA strands.
  2. Let primers bind complementary sites.
  3. Extend from each primer’s 3′ end.

New DNA is always synthesised 5′ → 3′.

Reverse transcription makes cDNA; PCR amplifies DNA.

PCR: predict the next step

PCR in motion

Accessible teaching summary

Heating separates a DNA duplex without breaking its backbones. Cooling allows two primers to bind opposite template strands, with their extendable 3′ ends pointing towards the target. DNA polymerase adds nucleotides to these ends, synthesising new strands 5′ to 3′. Repeated separation, primer binding and extension ideally doubles the DNA each cycle. Real reactions have less than perfect efficiency, and early products need not have both final target boundaries.

Authored equivalent of the teaching content; not a verbatim transcript.

Watch for this

Locate the primers. Which ends can the polymerase extend?

Why is one primer not sufficient for ordinary exponential PCR?

Then explain

Explain which molecular interaction makes this step selective.

Amplification creates copies—and can introduce bias

Completed cycles Ideal copies from one template
0 1
1 2
3 8
10 1,024
20 1,048,576

The ideal model is 2ⁿ. Real reactions have variable efficiency and eventually plateau.

Copies from one molecule are not independent biological replicates. Sequence-dependent amplification can distort representation.

RNA-seq starts with an experimental design

  • Define the contrast: tissue, condition, time point or treatment.
  • Collect independent biological replicates; technical repeats answer a different question.
  • Balance conditions across extraction, library preparation and sequencing batches.
  • Assess RNA quality and choose a protocol suited to the material.

A perfect sequencer cannot rescue a confounded experiment.

Which RNA population will enter the library?

Strategy What is enriched or retained? Important consequence
Poly(A) selection Polyadenylated RNA, mainly eukaryotic mRNA Misses many non-polyadenylated RNAs
rRNA depletion RNA remaining after removing targeted rRNAs Can include non-coding RNA and pre-mRNA
Targeted capture Selected transcripts/regions Limited by the target design

Choose for the organism, RNA integrity and biological question.

The library is a selected representation of the RNA sample.

Build a sequenceable library

RNA selection / depletion
↓
Fragment RNA · reverse transcribe · make double-stranded cDNA
↓
Prepare ends · attach adapters and sample indexes
↓
Optional / protocol-dependent PCR · library QC · pool

A representative workflow: some protocols fragment cDNA instead, combine steps, or use different adapter-addition strategies. Strand-specific chemistry preserves information about the original RNA strand.

Adapters give each fragment an interface

AdapterRNA-derived DNA insertAdapter
  • Flow-cell binding sequences tether the library to the surface.
  • Sequencing-primer sites let reads begin at defined positions.
  • A sample index identifies the pooled library.
  • A UMI, when included, tags an original molecule before amplification.

Index ≠ UMI: sample identity and molecule identity answer different questions.

Why make a cluster?

A single library molecule

One labelled base is too dim for the classical ensemble imaging strategy.

Local amplification creates a clonal cluster of many copies.

A brighter local signal

Copies ideally incorporate the same base in the same cycle.

The imager reads the combined signal at that position.

A cluster is a technical copy population, not a biological replicate.

Bridge amplification: tether, bend, copy, separate

Solution PCR versus surface amplification

PCR in solution Classical bridge amplification
Primers Free in the liquid Tethered to the surface
Products Dispersed through the tube Remain near the seed molecule
Main teaching purpose here Enrich/amplify a library Make individually imaged clusters
Shared principle Primer binding → extension → separation Primer binding → extension → separation

The library contains DNA derived from RNA, not RNA being copied by DNA polymerase.

Bridge amplification is a teaching model—not every flow cell

Classical flow cells

Randomly positioned clusters can be generated by bridge amplification.

Patterned flow cells

Defined nanowells control cluster positions; Illumina platforms can use exclusion amplification (ExAmp) and platform-specific clustering chemistry.

Keep the invariant idea: many local copies produce an interpretable sequencing signal. Check the instrument’s chemistry before describing its exact clustering method.

Sequencing by synthesis: one base, one image cycle

Paired-end sequencing reads both ends of a fragment

Read 1 →DNA insert← Read 2
  • The two reads originate from the same library fragment.
  • They can improve placement across repeats and splice junctions.
  • The middle may remain unsequenced if the insert is longer than both reads combined.
  • Paired reads are two observations of one fragment, not two independent RNA molecules.

Index reads identify the sample; they are separate from the biological insert reads.

What comes off the sequencer?

@fragment_001/1
ACGTACGTACGT
+
IIIIIIIIIIII
  • A read identifier, a nucleotide sequence, and per-base quality scores.
  • Demultiplexing assigns reads to samples using their indexes.
  • Base qualities describe confidence in calls—not biological importance.
  • Inspect adapters, quality, contamination and library composition before interpretation.

Spliced reads connect RNA-seq to alternative splicing

E1E2E3
Read evidence What does it support?
Inside shared E1 Expression, but not a unique isoform
Across E1–E2 or E2–E3 Exon 2 inclusion
Across E1–E3 Exon 2 skipping

A splice-aware genome alignment can jump across introns. Transcriptome-based quantification uses a different reference representation.

Short reads may not uniquely resolve complete isoforms.

Gene expression and isoform usage are different questions

Illustrative molecule counts Condition A Condition B
Isoform with exon 2 80 20
Isoform without exon 2 20 80
Total for the gene 100 100

Gene-level abundance is unchanged, while exon inclusion falls from 80% to 20%.

Real RNA-seq estimates must account for ambiguity, effective length, sampling and replicate variation. These are idealised molecule counts, not raw read counts.

From reads to a gene-by-sample matrix

Quality control and sample assignment
↓
Splice-aware alignment OR transcript-level quantification
↓
Summarise expression with an appropriate gene/transcript model
↓
Normalisation · replicate-aware modelling · biological interpretation

Raw counts depend on sequencing depth and composition. A count is not automatically an absolute number of cellular RNA molecules.

Choose a technology for the biological question

Question or property Microarray Short-read RNA-seq
Known genes Probe-based intensity Sequence-derived abundance
Unanticipated transcripts Limited by probe design Can provide new sequence evidence
Alternative splicing Needs informative probes Junctions and isoform evidence
Main limitations Cross-hybridisation, saturation Sampling, mapping ambiguity, library bias
Protein abundance? Not directly Not directly

Both need good design, controls, replication and validation.

Applications

  • Compare RNA abundance in cardiac versus skeletal muscle, or across cell differentiation.

  • Cells exposed to different conditions.

    • Physical (temperature, radiation).

    • Chemical (toxins).

    • Changing nutrient availability.

  • Compare tumour with matched non-tumour samples.

  • Study disease-associated expression changes alongside other molecular and clinical evidence.

  • Drug response.

Applications

Historical case study: measurement is not validation

The following original figures document early biomarker enthusiasm and reproducibility concerns.

  • The ovarian-cancer example concerns serum proteomics, not RNA-seq.
  • Historical performance estimates apply to the reported study, not to general clinical use.
  • The shared lesson is experimental design, independent validation and reproducible analysis.

The technology produced a breakthrough

The technology produced a breakthrough

The technology produced a breakthrough

The technology produced a breakthrough

Proteomics, Petricoin, Lancet 2.02

“The discriminatory pattern correctly identified all 50 ovarian cancer cases in the masked set, including all 18 stage I cases. Of the 66 cases of non malignant disease, 63 were recognized as not cancer. This result yielded a sensitivity of 100% specificity of 95%”

``New cancer test stirs hope and concern’’ Pollack A. New York Times, Feb. 3, 2004

“I’ve been in cancer research for 40 years and I think it’s the most important breakthrough in those years,” said Dr. John S. Kovach, director of…

Correlogic Systems… Quest Diagnostics and LabCorp… say they expect to begin offering the test in the next few months.

Early biomarker claims: reproducibility concerns

but\u2026

Why independent validation matters

but\u2026

On Reproducibility

On Reproducibility

Check your understanding

  1. Can two samples have equal gene expression but different splice-isoform proportions?
  2. Why does one-colour microarray comparison require separate chips?
  3. In chip manufacture, what determines where the next nucleotide attaches?
  4. How are reverse transcription, PCR and bridge amplification different?
  5. What does an RNA-seq read tell you—and what does it not tell you?

Next: preprocessing, quality control and differential expression.

Teaching resources and further reading

Detailed provenance and reuse information: MEDIA_SOURCES.md. Original interactive diagrams are editable teaching schematics; they simplify molecular scale and chemistry.